You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #50: Wha? I don't think so. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. Wha? I don't think so.
Straight from the mouth of one of the manufacturers: http://www.gelighting.com/na/business_lighting/faqs/cfl.htm#4

No vibration, no enclosed recessed fixtures, a reference to frequently turning them off and on. Sealed outdoor fixtures in hot environments (it can hit 105F where I live in the summer) have the same issues as sealed recessed lights, and ANYONE who has used CFL's outdoors in a cold environment can tell you about startup issues. CFL's are also pretty useless in any kind of shop environment, because they cannot deal with shock or abuse AT ALL. I tried putting one in my droplight once, and the thing lasted all of 20 minutes...the first time I dropped the light three inches, the bulb broke. The manufactrers generally warn against that kind of use anyway, since the dirty power and vibrations found in most shops will fry CFL electronics pretty quickly.

As for the power surge, the ballast electronics in a CFL work by precharging a capacitor, which then discharges into the cathode to excite the light. That initial charge, on a cold bulb, DOES draw more power than an incandescent at startup. Where CFL's are more efficient is in their ongoing power draw. While a bright CFL may initially draw 150 watts or more to light, its power requirements will quickly drop to 10 watts or less as the bulb warms over several minutes of use. The incandescent equivalent, of course, may pull 75 watts of power and keep pulling at that level indefinitely. That's the strength of a CFL...if the light is going to be left on, it will quickly become the more efficient solution. The idea only fails in locations where CFL's aren't left on long enough to reach maximm efficiency...water closets, refrigerators, that sort of thing. Incandescents are actually a more efficient solution in those situations.

If you want to refute any of this, please do so. Don't just drop a "BWAH, THAT'S NOT TRUE!" and leave it hanging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC