You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: At present, we still seem to have the luxury of determining the facts before we form opinions [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. At present, we still seem to have the luxury of determining the facts before we form opinions
Edited on Thu Nov-27-08 07:45 AM by struggle4progress
Is Iran in violation of the NPT? AFAIK, they are not. Is Iran building or planning to build nuclear weapons? AFAIK, there is no evidence that they are. They say they are not. The IAEA last year said there was no evidence that they were; these findings were disputed by France and USA, two states which (in apparent violation of the NPT) themselves continue to stockpile nuclear weapons:

IAEA findings on Iran dismissed
Tuesday, 30 October 2007, 09:52 GMT
France and the US have dismissed a finding by the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog Mohammed ElBaradei that there is no evidence of Iran building a bomb ... The US said Iran's efforts to enrich uranium, rather than import it more cheaply, indicated that it really wanted nuclear weapons. Mr ElBaradei said on Sunday that Tehran was years away from developing a bomb. Iran denies it is seeking to build nuclear weapons and says it wants only civilian nuclear energy ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7068478.stm

The claim that Iran is really enriching for weapons purposes should also raise a broader question, whether any nuclear power production is consistent with long-term global non-proliferation goals. It's possible, for example, to view the nuclear power industry as the result of a 1950s US public relations effort to paste a consumer-friendly "Atoms for Peace" face onto Cold War weapons-related uranium enrichment programs. On that view, one should ask why Iran is singled out for special attention: any enrichment program (not merely Iran's) should be regarded as suspect and should be subject to international inspections. Since BushCo has been, from the very start, an enemy of international agreements such as the NPT (sending John Bolton to undermine NPT talks a few years ago) and has regularly proposed the development of new US nuclear weapons, current US policy may simply be intended to further weaken the existing NPT by forcing Iran to jump through extra hoops. And given the lies that started the Iraq war, it is also plausible that BushCo accusations about Iran were first produced in hopes of broadening the Iraq war to neighboring countries

Whether Iran plans to build nuclear weapons or not, there seems to be no emergency and no need for overheated huff-n-puff: we should seek the over-arching issues and attempt to deal with them without hypocrisy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC