Reply #59: They are there illegally and it is an illegal war [View All]

[seemslikeadream]

I guess that's our main problem. If we don't agree on that then there is no use discussing it.


Dick Cheney pulled a fast one on the Congress and gets his war and his company gets the prize. Check out John Dean's new book.


The first set of problems arises from the legal status of contractors. Armed contractors—like the four men ambushed in Fallujah last week—fall into an international legal gray zone. They aren't "noncombatants" (as unarmed contractors are) under the 4th Geneva Convention, because they carry weapons and act on behalf of the U.S. government. However, they're also not "lawful combatants" under the 3rd Geneva Convention, because they don't wear uniforms or answer to a military command hierarchy. These armed contractors don't even fit the legal definition of mercenaries, because that definition requires that they work for a foreign government in a war zone, in which their own country isn't part of the fight. Legally speaking, they actually fall into the same gray area as the unlawful combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


http://slate.msn.com/id/2098571 /