You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: Another columnist calls her more dangerous than Cheney [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another columnist calls her more dangerous than Cheney
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 03:00 PM by RamboLiberal
Although some of my critics won’t believe it, there is no political agenda at work when I make this bold statement: As a hunter, Sarah Palin is a greater menace in the field than Dick Cheney.

And I have a feeling that real hunters among my readership will back me up on that. Fact is, Sarah Palin gives hunting a bad name, and it has nothing to do with the whole cruelty to animals argument, which I’ll leave for someone else to hash out. It’s based entirely on the fact that she’s so clueless and incompetent behind a gun that she ought to trade her rifle in on a tactical nuke, which doesn’t require the pinpoint accuracy a hunter needs to make meat without causing unnecessary suffering among the game population.

I came to this conclusion after a friend told me that as a former hunter, shooter and avid outdoorsman, I had to watch the episode of “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” where she and her dad go into the backcountry after caribou. I’d never watched an episode of that show, for obvious reasons, but I dialed that one up just so I could discuss it with my buddy. And I was horrified.

-----

• Before they leave for their hunting camp (hundreds of miles away by plane), Sarah’s dad tells the camera crew what a great shot his daughter (whom he always curiously refers to as Sarah Palin, not just Sarah) is with a rifle. But then he says that he’s bringing two guns on the hunt, a big game rifle for him and a “varmint” rifle for her, because she doesn’t like guns that kick.

That was the first red flag. A competent hunter knows that your rifle has to have a big enough caliber to bring down the game you’re after. That’s a humane consideration. Use the right caliber and place your shot carefully, and you can fill your freezer without causing the animal undue suffering. Use a caliber that’s too small, and unless you make a perfect shot, you run the chance of just wounding the game. That’s never good, and a prospect that gives competent hunters nightmares. Going after a game animal like a caribou, which can weigh as much as 700 pounds, with a varmint rifle isn’t just asking for trouble, it’s real cruelty in the making.

http://examiner.gmnews.com/news/2010-12-16/Greg_Bean's_Column/Duck_and_cover_because_Sarahs_locked_and_loaded.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC