Reply #12: I'm having trouble with the Fourth point: [View All]

[lindashaw]

Quoting post: Fourth, out of Canada I have been provided information that could explain the technology sources that made 9-11 possible, including a company that was doing business with the State of New York in a service area that would have made it easy to have installed a ground station in or around WTC to where flying planes remotely as UAV could be done easily.

This company is owned by a Bush Pioneer and a Canadian firm that has major US investors that are directly tied to either GHWB or GWB.

Our sources indicate that such a ground station and antennas might have been in WTC 7 and the reason that building was destroyed . End quote.

I know that this remote-control technology exists and has been talked since 9/11 in case of hi-jacked planes...But real planes did strike the towers (real people died)even if the verdict is still out about the Pentagon. So, is it now being posited that hi-jackers got on those planes and then the planes were taken over at some point by a remote control? I'm confused...