You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #72: Wow, is that convoluted thinking [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
72. Wow, is that convoluted thinking
First, you admit communism fails your first tenant of religion: it doesn't have a belief in a supernatural power or powers. For most people, that is THE definition of religion, so you lose a lot of support and credibility right there with your inability to support that position.

Your second tenant is a circular argument: communism puts the life and conditions of a person in a religious order because communism is a religion, and communism is a religion because it puts the life and conditions of a person in a religious order. The argument loops around itself, using itself to support its own argument.

Third, who was the spiritual leader of Communism? Was he/she worldwide like the Pope, or were there seperate spiritual leaders in different countries? Who were they in Russia? In China? In Cuba? All their leaders have been political, not religious, in nature. In the USSR they elected new leaders through general elections, something you rarely do in a religion. They never lead their countrymen in prayer; in fact conventional religious beliefs were widely denounced in the USSR. Churches and synagogues were widely banned in many areas.

Four can be applied to almost anyone committed to a cause or belief they care about. For example, I am a self-proclaimed gun nut. I am sure that if you asked a few of my friends how I feel about guns and gun control, they would describe my beliefs as "a cause, principle or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion." That hardly means I worship my firearms, does it? Well, ok sometimes pretty close to it, but still.

Your "evidence" is weak at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC