You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: The facts are still thin.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. The facts are still thin....
...but some of the early indicators are that this may have been a tactical military defeat of US forces.

Evidence:
The supply lines to American attacking forces was cut (or at least disrupted). The cease fire (American side only) may have been necessary because the armored support was out of gas.

Some (if not all) of the Iraqi forces refused to fight against the Fallugians. If the Americans were counting on Iraqis to provide flank or supply line support, a cease fire (or tactical retreat) would be necessary to re-evaluate troop placement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC