You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: There has been a lot of coverage about these intelligence "failures" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. There has been a lot of coverage about these intelligence "failures"
Edited on Sun Apr-11-04 11:37 AM by Dover
but you have to wonder...IF this was just incompetence then WHY didn't heads roll in these agencies? In most cases it seems that these failures occurred at the upper levels, while the agents in the field were doing their job and reporting on activities:

From CNN story in 2002:

http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/06/04/column.billpress/

...As reported by Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman — under the chilling headline "The Hijackers We Let Escape" — the CIA was aware of at least two of the hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, at least 21 months before September 11. The agency knew both men had ties to al-Qaida. They knew one was connected to the bombing of the USS Cole. They knew both men once lived in the United States. They knew both attended a January 2000 al-Qaida summit meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. And they knew both men were returning to the States afterwards.

Yet, as hard as it is to believe, the agency did nothing. It didn't alert the INS, which could have stopped them at the border. It didn't notify U.S. Naval Intelligence, even though both men were living near the San Diego naval base. And it failed to inform the FBI, which could have tracked their movements and contacts with other al-Qaida members around the country.

Instead, thanks to the inaction of the CIA, from January 2000 to August 2001, Almihdhar and Alhazmi lived openly in the United States, all the while plotting to destroy us. They rented an apartment, got driver's licenses, opened bank accounts and took flying lessons — all in their own names. They were even listed in the San Diego phone directory! And they remained in constant contact with their co-conspirators living in other states.

Only in August 2001, after receiving additional "static" about a potential terrorist attack, did the CIA wake up and inform other agencies to be on the lookout for the two San Diego men. By then it was too little, too late. Almihdhar, Alhazmi and 17 other murderers were already underground, in final preparations for 9/11. If only the CIA had done its job and alerted them earlier, one FBI official told Newsweek, "There's no question we could have tied all 19 hijackers together" — and prevented the horror of September 11.

Where's the outrage?

The question all Americans should be asking is: Why isn't someone being held accountable for the intelligence failures that led to September 11? They happened on CIA Director George Tenet's watch. Why is he still on the job? It's hard to blame FBI Director Robert Mueller, since he only took office a week before 9/ll. But who are the knuckleheads at FBI Central who ignored the warnings from Phoenix and Minneapolis? And why haven't they been fired?


If local police officers failed to act after receiving a tip that a gang of thieves was about to rob a bank, you can bet they'd all be out of a job. We should demand no less of the FBI and CIA. The best way to prevent future terrorist attacks is to fire those responsible for the last ones.
__________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC