You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: More than willing to discuss [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-04 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. More than willing to discuss
Kalian I have read many of your posts and I agree with much that you say. I have responded to them at times in support though I imagine you didn't notice since you are all over me here.

But really, what's to discuss here? If you believe that Kerry could possibly be as bad as Bush for the military members, please state that, right now. I don't. Do I LIKE Kerry? No, I don't. When the primary rolled around here, I voted for Kucinich. That ought to tell you where I am coming from. Nonetheless, the choice in November WILL be between Kerry and Bush. Put Kerry against Bob Dole and I might think about a third party vote. Put him against Bush and it's a no-brainer.

There are a number of reasons for this. If you want to speak of what Kerry would do in Iraq, fine. I am discouraged by Kerry's apparent desire to "go the distance" in Iraq, but I do think he would handle it better than Bush has. Our current aggresive stance vis a vis Fallujah and Sadr for example. I think that Kerry would be far less aggressive and more diplomatic.

In domestic matters there are clear differences that I certainly hope don't need to be explained. One thing I do think needs pointing out though is that whoever is president circa 2005-2009, they WILL be appointing new Supreme Court justices. The possible Bush nominees give me nightmares. Kerry would nominate far better people, and this is vitally important. It is interesting to note that a Leftist in this time frame could not possibly get like-minded appointees past Congress. If DK were to somehow be president there is NO WAY IN HELL he'd ever get people who shared his ideological boat onto the USSC. Kerry however, could get moderate leftists on the bench. The White House is ephemeral, the USSC is a more lasting and important critter. If for only this reason alone, Bush MUST be evicted from the White House.

I could go on but I won't. I don't need to, you are an intelligent person and easily see where I am coming from. I am not fond of Kerry, but Bush must go and being critical of Kerry at this point in time is not particularly helpful in that regard. Let's focus on the true enemy for now, and only after focus on our principle. Let not the good be the enemy of the perfect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC