You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: It's hard to say [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's hard to say
Edited on Thu Apr-15-04 04:35 PM by theboss
Bin Laden's grievances are so general and his theology so medieval that it's hard to say who exactly he hates most and what exactly his immediate goals are.

You have to take a step back. Bin Laden's ideology was forges into during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. (Ignore this he is a CIA plant stuff; that's such an exagerration). His main issue was that the USSR was a secular, godless state trying to impose its worldview in a Muslim World. I think this eventually morphed into the entire West (USSR, Europe, USA, Australia, etc) were all godless states trying to impose their will on the Muslim World. Though at the time, he was more than happy to use the help of the US in holding back the Soviets (who weren't defeated so much as simply exhausted in trying to hold Afghanistan, which may later be repeated by us in Iraq).

I think what Bin Laden took from the Soviet retreat was that the West was weak. The USSR had won, but was too weak spiritually to maintain it's victory. He was weak military but had Allah. I also think he saw himself as being instrumental in the total collapse of the USSR (which he very well might have been).

Over the next few years, I think he became more radicalized and wanted to impose his brand of Islam on all the Muslim world, which meant that Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Lybia, etc were also his enemies. I think his real hatred was for the Royal Family in SA at this point. And I think that was transferred to the US when we stationed troops in the kingdom during and after the Gulf War. And I think he was pissed that the US humiliated a Muslim country (even if he hated that government.

Basically I think Bin Laden's philosophy is a tower of hate. I think the Saudis were at the top of the list until they let the Americans inot the Holy Land.

So, he probably would have focussed on Saudi Arabia before the US. But of course, if Saudi Arabia went up in an Islamic Revolution, we probably would have intervened anyway and he would have been gone after the US eventually.

Bin Laden could give a shit about the Palestinians. He never mentioned them until after 9/11. He clearly hates Israel, but that's just for existing in the first place. A I/P peace plan would do little to appease him because Israel would still be there. He does recognize the PR value of the Palestinians though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC