You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: It is so hard to die without any heirs. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. It is so hard to die without any heirs.
States look so far for relatives so that it would be incredibly hard for someone to die intestate without passing their property rights to someone. And even if they don't have a relative, the rights in the invention would still pass to the state. They wouldn't just disappear.

I don't know what happens if a right in an invention passes to the state however -- it might become public property, but, more likely, some state official would become the trustee of the right and they would then be able to enforce the rights for the benefit of a trust -- but I'm really just guessing here. If the inventor died in my state, I'd definitely want to look into the possiblity that the state coffers could be filled a little bit by collecting patent royalties for this inventor who died with no relatives.

If a company is using an invention knowing that the inventor has died, they're probably still violating somebody's rights in the invention. What they're doing is just using the invention knowing that nobody was close enough to the inventor to know that there's a right to the invention out there that is being violated.

I bet if you tracked down some relatives, and told them to get a lawyer, they might be able to get some money from the invention. Of course, they'd probably be happy to settle with the company -- which means the invention would continue to be used. But, what it would mean in the short and long term for the company is that they'd have to share their profits with the relatives of the inventor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC