You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #283: Why not just read US v. MIller to find out how the Supreme Court [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

hansberrym

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-01-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #94

283. Why not just read US v. MIller to find out how the Supreme Court

defined what the term "militia" means in the second amendment.
That would be the logical first step, and I suppose it would also be predictable.

But if you prefer clever bullshit, then I suggest Silveira. The Ministry of Truth has got nothing on Judge Reinhardt, and it is hours of fun (so unpredictable at every turn!) because you just never know what clever half-truth or out right lie the judge will come up with next. Its DOUBLE-PLUS GOOD to the last sentence.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x54661#54758

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.