You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why I no longer want to jump off a cliff (and neither should you) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 07:02 PM
Original message
why I no longer want to jump off a cliff (and neither should you)
Advertisements [?]
Its taken a few days. At first I didn't want to read the paper, watch the news, or even come here. But I dipped my toe in the water and I'm glad I did. Cause it got me started thinking, rather than just hurting.

First, and somewhat flippantly, I have to ask: if the exit polls were so far off the mark with regard to who folks were voting for, why is the exit poll on why they voted being taken as the gospel?

Second, before everyone starts jumping off of cliffs, keep in mind the following: in 1972, McGovern only got 28.9 million votes (under 40 percent); in 1976, in victory, Carter only got 40 million votes; in 1980, Carter was down to 35.5 million (just over 40 percent), and the number was about the same for Mondale in 1984, and in 1988, Dukakis got just under 42 million (45 percent). And in terms of electoral college numbers, Nixon got 520 against McGovern, Reagan got 525 and 489 in his two wins, and Bush I got 426.

So spare me the eulogies for the Democratic party. With nearly 56 million votes, and around 48.5 percent of the total, you could say that the glass is half full rather than half empty, at least in comparison with the not too distant past.

(Also, the 3.5 million vote margin between Kerry and Bush doesn't look so bad when you compare it to the margins of the past: McGovern (18 million down); Carter (8.5 million down); Mondale (17 million down); Dukakis (7 million down).

Finally, the last line in the CBS commentary suggested that the Democrats problem is their inability to find the "right" candidate, something that the commentary further suggested was "a very difficult condition to cure."

I don't buy it: was Gore the right candidate? a couple of hundred votes and/or a different supreme court and the answer might have been yes. Kerry? Maybe not, but was the problem "moral values" or some phony patriotism ginned up by a post-9/11 campaign of fear mongering. Dukakis? Okay, bad choice. Carter: good choice and then bad choice. But not because of a moral values issue. But because of inflation, gas prices, and Iranian hostages.

So let's not lose all perspective here. Tuesday sucked. The next four years will suck. The supreme court may end up sucking for a long time. But each day we get closer to 2008 is a day closer to a chance to regain the presidency. It won't be easy. But its not as hard as some folks seem to be suggesting based on bogus analyses.
Now go and try to enjoy a nice fall weekend.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC