You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: We didn't "lose big". [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-06-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #54
69. We didn't "lose big".
51% is not a MANDATE.

Considering the fact that you had Bush and Cheney scaring the Bejeebus out of people (Cheney, remember, was telling people that with Kerry as president we would get hit with a nuclear attack) I think that Bushco's performance was incredibly weak.

You start selling out the pro-choice voters in the Democratic Party, and there won't BE a Democratic Party. Which may sound good to you, but it sure doesn't to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC