You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: I would tend to agree with your analysis [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I would tend to agree with your analysis
Not to mention the bible is filled with sinners of all manner, including Paul. Adulturators, theives, liars, murderers, fornicators, and so forth abound - such is the nature of mankind. The idea is to fight that nature and rise above the animal instincts. Trying to say that KJ was gay and hoping that gets one anywhere is like saying Paul was ok with stoning someone before his conversion so it was ok.

Christians are sinners like others, the difference is they try to fight against that sin instead of saying it feels good and natural so it must be ok.

This is not an attempt to say they are right or wrong or to interject to others how I think they should live their lives, it is simply my own insight into such things. It is akin to buddhism in some ways in this train of denying oneself certain things for some reason, and it is also flows into the non-religious world where we have people who smoke, drink, eat too much, and so forth but are told it is wrong because it is bad for them and others. It all goes to a 'morals' thing, and everyone has some set of moral ideals and philosophy which they get from somewhere - either religion or self analysis of things. Thing too, is that everyone tries to evangelize their view and opinions by preaching to others how they should feel and act. We can complain about christians, et al, being in power and passing legislation which has a basis in their beliefs, but from where I sit that is precisely what everyone else does really - they just drop the scriptures and use the works of someone else or their own personal view.

To me the best way to get people on board with a train of thoughts or ideas is to understand theirs at the core and discuss with them things at that level. An example of this would be the amish and early christians who generally were/are not involved in the political arena - all they want is to be free to live in their own little place and live how they see fit (and this was something which occured often in the early US where we had communes from socialists to christians spring up - people lived their own way on their own land and the federal government was not overly involved in how people lived their lives and one group did not bother the other).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC