You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #177: Now you're changing the subject [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #175
177. Now you're changing the subject
I never said Nancy Grace was the prosecutor in the case. I said she publicly accused Richard Ricci without sufficient evidence. A few posts up, you asked for a transcript for proof. I provided it. Now you're putting words in my mouth about whether Nancy Grace was the actual prosecutor. Here is just a small example of an instance when she said Ricci was guilty:

"...KING: Nancy, is the wife's alibi a wash?

GRACE: Total wash. And we were discussing this the other day, Larry. The fact that she has claimed and professed her husband's innocence -- the man apparently has been involved in many, many crimes since their marriage, possibly now a bank robbery. And she claims he respected Mr. Smart, he was home that night, he's had nothing to do with any of this. Her alibi is crushed. And another thing, Larry, regarding the MO, this is not a guy that waits for you to leave on Saturday to go do your errands or go out of town, breaks the window and steals your VCR. This is a cat burglar willing to go in at night, take what he wants. That's what happened the night Elizabeth was abducted. ..."

Repeat: "That's what happened the night Elizabeth was abducted". That's directly saying Ricci did it. The issue in this thread is Nancy Grace's character; whether she has a good heart and is honest and forthright. Apprarently, she was disciplined for corrupt and dishonest practices while she was practicing law. She has continued in a pattern of having little regard for truth or justice in her career as a commentator. I personally would never accuse a man like Ricci without all the evidence being in. I have fought all my adult life for justice and for fairness. I may not be the best lawyer in the world, but I have an absolutely unblemished record with no discipline and I know many, many other lawyers, men and women, who put truth, justice and honesty first and foremost in the practice of law. I have seen too many in the DA's office, however, men and women, like Nancy Grace, who really have no concern for justice. For them, it's all about ego, winning, and political advancement. The DA's office is all about politics. While I admit that I don't know everything about Nancy Grace's own life, I certainly don't like what I've seen in her professional life as a commentator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC