You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: You are so mistaken. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #61
70. You are so mistaken.
Edited on Sat Apr-09-05 03:36 PM by merh
The birthmarks as seen on known images of Gannon that correlate to the birthmarks that were Johnnie Gosch's identifiers are stronger identifiers than simple "looks likes" id's made by strangers.

What I find curious is why so many have spent so much time trying to "kill" the discussion rather than just ignore it. If they feel it is useless or silly why even worry about it?

Do they believe the LIHOP or MIHOP theories? If they don't believe them, do they spend time going to the 9/11 forums trying to convince others that they are right and that those that share the LIHOP/MIHOP positions are kooky conspiracy theorists trying to harm the reputation of DU?

DU is a message board, if it had any political power or the ability to alter the efforts of the admin and the moral majority, the 2004 election would not have been stolen, the USofA would never have begun an illegal and immoral war and 9/11 would be thoroughly investigated.

We share common goals, we share common concerns, but to think that our "credibility" has any impact on the operations of our government is to think that discussion an issue alone can bring about change. Discussions are important, but proactive, unified efforts are the key. Our credibility comes from viable grassroots efforts to be heard, not from discussing possibilities on the internet.

The horrendous criminal enterprises that involve the current administration and the various members of congress are many. To close our eyes to one such scandal because it is "out there" is to, in effect, become an accomplice to the crime. I, for one, do not want the child sex rings to flourish because the theory is so extreme or hard to fathom. Because kids are at risk, I feel that I must take part in the efforts to bring the scandals to light, to stop the abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC