You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Oh I agree. The authors were probably just venting or protesting. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
tubbacheez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Oh I agree. The authors were probably just venting or protesting.
For all I know, their INTENT might have been peachy. But the content of the message could be reasonably construed as inciting violence.


And just like how saying "But I was just venting and didn't mean to cause a panic" would not be a very strong defense for shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater, certain vents/rants/protests are not going to be protected free speech.

It's more of a practical consideration than a formal one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC