You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #71: Thanks, Tinoire [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Thanks, Tinoire
I've always enjoyed your posts, and especially your research! I'm afraid there are some here who would certainly disagree with your opinion of me, though!

I do agree with your characterization of so many of these people as pseudo-religious, as that is how I've referred to them as well. For far too many of them it seems that their religion is just a cover or a shield for their true agendas. It's very sad that they've been able to make it to positions of power where they can actually pursue their goals.

I know it's only Observer Status, but it is still much more than the other religious organizations of the world get. I'd just rather they all stay out of politics, regardless of their nation state status.

My main concern with Ratzinger is that he has apparently been the guiding force of the Vatican for many years now, the man behind the curtain if you will. At his direction, the Church has refocused its attentions and energies away from the social and economic justice issues and onto issues such as abortion, gay rights, contraception and married clergy. It seems that his actions show us what he feels is important, and I don't like what I see. Add to that his comments deriding leftist economic theories, and I become very concerned. I only hope that he can be contained somewhat, and that the Church at least stays focused on the economic justice for which it has been known.

And I guess it is now only appropriate to call him Pope Benedict? I'll have to remember that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC