You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plame\Rove: Panel Discussion Provokes Heated Exchange (Video) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:41 PM
Original message
Plame\Rove: Panel Discussion Provokes Heated Exchange (Video)
Advertisements [?]
Did you guys catch this? Just heard about this today on Morning Sedition. Videos at link below.

Panel:

NORMAN PEARLSTINE, Time Inc.
FLOYD ABRAMS, First Amendment Attorney
NICHOLAS LEMANN, Dean of Gradate School of Journalism at Columbia University
MICHAEL GOODWIN, NY Daily News
RICHARD COHEN, Washington Post
MICHAEL WOLFF, Vanity Fair
PAUL HOLMES, Reuters

ALSO PRESENT:

CATHERINE CRIER, Court TV Anchor


<snip>

NEW YORK (Court TV) — With New York Times reporter Judith Miller spending her 42nd day in jail for refusing to reveal a source, Court TV convened seven of the biggest names in the media industry to discuss journalists and their confidential sources Tuesday.

What followed was a lively, often belligerent debate that focused on Miller and the rest of the Valerie Plame investigation and was marked by recriminations, regrets and at least one profanity.

Time Inc. Editor-in-Chief Norman Pearlstine told the moderator, Court TV anchor Catherine Crier, that while he stood by his decision to turn over his reporter's notes about a confidential source to the special prosecutor in the Plame case, he questioned whether the reporter, Matt Cooper, should have given the source, White House advisor Karl Rove, anonymity in the first place.

"A 90-second conversation with the president's spin doctor who is trying to undermine the workings of a whistle blower didn't deserve confidential source status," Pearlstine said.

<snip>

Link: http://www.courttv.com/news/2005/0816/panel_ctv.html

Gets a bit testy apparently.

:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC