You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gephardt is trying to save overtime [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 03:01 PM
Original message
Gephardt is trying to save overtime
Advertisements [?]
I've read the threads about Gephardt withholding his vote on the overtime bill. I've never seen so much disinformation. Let's get the facts straight.

Here's what the AFL-CIO said about the bill:

http://www.aflcio.org/yourjobeconomy/overtimepay/ns07142003.cfm

"The 213–210 House vote killed an amendment authored by Reps. David Obey (D-Wis.) and George Miller (D-Calif.) that would have blocked changes proposed by the Bush administration to take away overtime pay rights for millions of American workers. The amendment was attached to the fiscal year 2004 Labor and Health and Human Services and Education appropriations bill (H.R. 2660), which President George W. Bush on July 9 threatened to veto if it included the Obey-Miller amendment."

Here's a roll-call of how everyone voted:

http://www.nbc4.com/news/2325847/detail.html

If Gephardt and the other Democrats like Harman had voted yes on the amendment, and it passed, Bush would have vetoed. So, they played some insider baseball and withheld their votes - it shows that the Democrats can pick up enough votes on this issue to block attempts by Bush and the Republicans to kill overtime. Gephardt didn't vote no, he withheld his vote. Everyone knows how he would have voted. By letting him and other pro-worker Representatives withhold their vote, it technically allowed the amendment to fail, while showing we had the votes to pass it.

Saying Gephardt just couldn't be bothered is, well, total crap, and anyone who is familiar with Gephardt's record knows this. He doesn't have solid union support for not caring about worker's rights.

Gephardt has a solid record voting for workers on job issues. There are many things you can criticize him for, but this isn't it.

Compared to Lieberman, Dean, Kerry, and Graham, Gephardt and Kucinich have solid records for workers, against firing American workers and replacing them with third world labor, and against NAFTA. Gephardt and Kucinich, are part of the pro-worker, anti-corporate wing of the party, and they are the ones I'm supporting in the primaries.

DU likes to think that Gephardt's poor showing on internet polls and meetups matter all that much - they don't. Gephardt will have strong union support, and he will be a strong candidate.

Gephardt can beat Bush easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC