You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: Would you care to hear from a Photoshop "expert?" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-15-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
58. Would you care to hear from a Photoshop "expert?"
I've been using PS since version 1, and I can fake a picture that would have you convinced your grandma was hang gliding with Arnold Schwarzenegger if you paid me enough.

Your observations about the photo are simply not accurate, for a number of reasons. First and foremost, there is no way of telling what "generation" this photo is. I has been copied, posted, e-mailed and re-copied so many times, and each step in the process has the potential to add artifacts to the image.

The halo around Bush's hand are perfect examples. When you compress a photograph for web posting, the .jpg format is almost universal. It is considered a "lossy" compression (as opposed to "loss-less"), which means that when you create the .jpg file, it consolidates like pixels in order to lessen the digital information and thus make the file size smaller, and upload/download faster. There is no way to avoid this. None, except using a very high setting with minimal loss...which no one does for publication on the web, because it completely defeats the purpose of compressing the file in the first place.

ANY photo saved at a normal .jpg setting will exhibit these artifacts.

Second, as to the shadow falling off the back...that is called dodging. It is a photography technique to bring out the important parts of a photo. It's counterpart is called "burning," which does the same thing in reverse. There are Dodge and Burn tools in Photoshop. It is done with a little stick or other shield in convention darkroom developing. It is very common in news photos.

As for the capital I's being different...uh, not like we can really tell anyway, but hey...this is handwritten. Bush writes in mixed case, as I often do. So what? I would expect handwritten letters to differ slightly from character to character.

Now please, stop this nonsense. Reuters is a respected news organization, and has everything to lose by publishing a fake photo like this. Everything.



Just ask Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC