You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Not a lawyer, but.. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
wrathofkahn Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not a lawyer, but..
It's my understanding that a sitting President must first be impeached and removed from office (two separate events) before being tried for any case of "high crimes and misdemeanors." Therefore, impeachment and subsequent removal from office is not legal proof of guilt, but instead it opens the door to prosecution. As it was explained to me once before (I think in my poli-sci class 10 years ago), the impeachment and removal process can loosely be thought of as a kind of special "grand jury."

Again, I'm not a lawyer (nor do I play one on TV); I'm just going off of my own understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC