You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: that's true [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
plurality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. that's true
but the problem is, the plan was to occupy for years all along. We knew that and I'm sure the Dems knew that. And they should have realized that the Iraqis weren't going to go for a permanent occupation. And regardless of how prepared we were for the post-war realities, we'd still be seeing casualties being there will undoubtedly be resistance. So this is not a good attack plan, because even if one of their plans (did they even have a plan or were they just along for the ride?) was being used our soldiers would still be dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC