You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: Men who don't want babies [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Men who don't want babies
shouldn't have sex. Period.

That's what women have been told by the pro-life team for ages. If you have sex and get pregnant, tough. It's yours. You're stuck with it. Even in cases of rape, incest, threats to the mother's health and sanity and life and livelihood -- more often than not in this day and age and in this political climate, the fetal rights should come first, the father's rights second, and the woman is a distant third tier claimant on any rights that might be left over. In other words, she's just a brainless vessel for maturing a fertilized egg.

When a man has sex with a woman, he should know that unless he has had a vasectomy, there is a chance she will become pregnant. And she is the only one who can. that pregnancy may kill her -- it won't kill him. that pregnancy may maim her for life -- it won't hurt him.

the risks the man takes are emotional -- gee, what if she gets pregnant and decides to abort and I don't want her to? -- and financial -- gee, what if she gets pregnant and decides to sue me for child support?

even if he accepts the burden of those emotional risks, can they compare to the similar risks the woman faces? That zygote/embryo/fetus/baby is PART OF HER. she has nourished it with her blood. it is inside her. it is not some abstract little bit of a haploid sperm cell jettisoned in a moment of . . . . whatever.

child support payments rarely cover the full cost of raising a child. Again, there's the issue of emotional burden, physical burden. A man writes out a check and it's over and done with; the woman is left with the day to day burden, the taking off work and sitting up nights when the kid is sick or not taking off work and missing the school play and dealing with the guilt.

i'm sorry, guys, but when you mess around, you gotta pay the piper, and in this case the woman has (IMHO) 99% of the responsibility and 100% of the rights. she is first in line, the baby is second and you, sorry, are third. Don't like it? then don't have sex.

You don't want to risk that she'll abort "your" child? Then don't have sex with her. You don't want to risk that any woman might abort "your" child? Then don't have sex. You want to have it without any risks to you, but you don't want to take responsibility for the risks that are hers no matter what.

The idea of late-term abortiobn bothers me, and I admit it. But the idea of denying women control over their own most personal possession -- their bodies -- bothers me one fucking hell of a lot more.

Tansy Gold, militant radical feminist and savage pro-choicer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC