You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #338: The payment of support to the child is not unfair nor one-sided [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #336
338. The payment of support to the child is not unfair nor one-sided
The woman is only able to collect child support ON BEHALF OF THE CHILD if she also takes the responsibility to raise it. This is not a one-way street. She contributes her portion -- cash, time, blood sweat and tears, worry, etc. ALL he is required to contribute is cash.

The guys who are so vocal against this seem to be using an argument that they are bound to pay the full price while the mother gets off paying nothing. AU CONTRAIRE.

If she decides against raising the child, either through abortion or adoption, she's off the hook and so is he. Fair and square, even steven.

The only scenario the guys object to is when they don't want the kid but she does, for whatever reason, and she decides he has to live up to his obligation TO THE KID.

That obligation was sealed when they had sex -- obligation to any child that might be born of the union. She is not obligated to carry it, but if she does, he's obligated to help pay for it.

Options? Choices? You think it's all up to the woman? You've got all kinds of choices, ranging from vasectomy to condom to masturbation. You want free and easy naked-penile-tissue-to-naked-vaginal-tissue sex, then you accept the consequences, and part of that is accepting the responsibility that if she gets pregnant and decides to keep it. And you can't possibly suggest at this point that you're uninformed of potential consequences (which is why SOME of us are sooooo insistent on real sex education instead of just "oooh, noooo, don't do that dirty deed!").

You would much prefer that things stay the way they were in the good ol' days, when you had free run of the earthly brothel, to plant your squiggly little seeds wherever you felt like it. To brand any woman who had sex with you a fallen hussy and thus fair game for any future forays by you and/or your friends. Etc. Etc.

What some of us are saying here is no fucking way. You wanna have sex, you accept the responsibilities. Be a MAN about it, instead of a quivering dick. Quit whining.

Sheesh, I'm wondering why any DU-ish woman would want to get into the sack with these guys. I'll bet they're just as insensitive to the sexual pleasure of their partners as they are when it comes to taking care of the results. Ick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC