You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #3: The short answer is no. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Fovea

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-29-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message

3. The short answer is no.

But then you have to ask the other question.
Would the iraqis been better off with an internationally sanctioned regieme change? Would the iraqis been better off with water and electricity? How about the thousands we killed in bombardment, would they rather have their life back?

This could have been done so much better without invasion.
But that would not have made Bechtel, Brown and Root, Halliburton, and all the other oil monopolists happy piggies, now would it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.