You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: well, based on science [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. well, based on science
there is no way that anything associated with Jesus is real, right? I mean obviously he didn't turn water into wine and feed the masses with loaves and fishes, or heal the sick or raise Lazarus from the dead, or any of that.

so given the fact that Jesus was, at best, a decently quotable iternerant preacher, then the Shroud of Turin doesn't mean anything anyway.

you can't have it both ways. it is either important because Jesus was important which acknowledges Jesus, or a 2000 year old cloth, because Jesus wasn't anybody special.

which do you want? you can't have it both ways either.

and by the way, I have a spare capacitator for your sarcasmometer if you need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC