You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: No,I am not advocating barbarism [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No,I am not advocating barbarism
I think the state making decisions about who lives and who dies is DANGEROUS.

As for me I read scientists are not 100 %sure if she could feel pain.
I am unwilling to risk torture for the health of the state.

I also think the state has no business in deciding if Terry lives or dies.

That said I was trying to bring up issues about this case no one is seeing.

Like right now Bush is cutting veterans benefits..Health benifiets are being curt for EVERYONE else too.

Alot of people coming back from war have brain injuries.Bush is cutting veterans benefits AND he refuses to allow stem cell research that could offer help to brain injured people..What does that look like to you?

Also Terry is not a sentimental but disabled public figure like Reagan.Why is SHE singled out a target when there are plenty of other people suffering in similar circumstances who's voices are not being heard.

And why NOW? Why is Terry Shiavo a hot button Now?

The timing of this national debate is very suspicious to me.Considering Thimerosol. Mercury and the damage done.
And brain injured Veterans. The "tort reform"issue...
We were not debating this issue before the war when there were no brain injured veterans coming home to be ignored raising a ruckus for their benefits.

I saw a similar pattern when the media was discussing whether torture is ever justified..Than Abu Gharib,they were testing public outrage reactions.The government knew torture was going to occur they wanted to see if the public would go along with them.And since we didn't storm the white house Gonzales..is attorney General..Something sick about that pattern don't you think?

Think about the deeper and wider horrid implications that a court ruling will have on pa person who is disabled,and their right to live, their right to die and the dulling of human compassion that invariably happens when the state makes life or death decisions.

That process is what scares me about this case,besides the obvious frightening part of the inhumanity of the state deciding Terry's fate and overriding her family in favor of death...

I am very afraid for us all.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC