You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: Well, what Hitler did was irrelevant to what FDR did in the US [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Well, what Hitler did was irrelevant to what FDR did in the US
I agree with you that FDR probably did not think about interning Japanese when he won in 1932 as opposed to Hitler and the Jews, but the fact that he acquiesced where he should have remained firm is my criticism, and I believe it is an extremely valid one. When one deals with practical issues, I recommend pragmatism, but when it comes to issues that test one's principles, I recommend one should be as firm and uncompromising as possible.

Yes, there was a lot of ignorance in the US, and there continues to be quite a bit of ignorance in the US. I would assert that the level of ignorance over social and economic issues is still pretty high. We're ignorant, just not as ignorant as before. Otherwise, we would not be electing presidents of the caliber of Bush. Whether or not people have a college degree may not matter that much, especially when it comes to issues of prejudice and irrational hate. After all, would one bet his life on the proposition that all people who have a college degree are not racist or prejudiced in any way, shape, or form? Rich white people have been going to college for generations, but it didn't stop them from institutionalizing hatred of black people.

However, I will politely disagree and say that I don't think that in any way justifies interning Japanese-American citizens to protect them from the ignorance of white people. While it may have saved Japanese from being lynched or killed if there were Japanese in the deep south like Mississippi or Alabama or any "very rural" area (they're everywhere even in parts of California), it should also be stated again that it in no way justifies internment either, especially given that the vast majority of Japanese-Americans lived on the west coast. As I always say, "A wrong should not be answered with another wrong." I would think that the lessons learned from the experience with the Japanese led precisely to the decision, at least thus far, not to single out and intern hundreds of thousands of Arab-Americans in camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC