Reply #2: Interesting article [View All]

[mikehiggins]

in Time Magazine. It points out that many Democrats have doubts about Clark's sincerity as a Democrat because he was laudatory of them in a speech given in 2001. Now another speech as been reported that was given in January 2002, in which he similarly said the President and the administration were doing a good job in Afghanistan.

Clearly, Clark's obvious inability to read minds and his total failure to foretell the future disqualify him for consideration. Other Democratic candidates, on the other hand, clearly went public in January 2002, five months or so following the destruction of the World Trade Center, with their heartfelt criticism of President Bush and their total opposition to the governments actions against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

For those of you who need this sort of thing spelled out, I am being sarcastic.

There might be a point to this article but it seems more likely to be just another partisan attack intended to prevent Wes Clark from winning the Democratic nomination.