You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: There are many aspects to this issue. First it is all about land use [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. There are many aspects to this issue. First it is all about land use
policy. If we use land to grow fuel we are not using it to grow food which produces the expected rise in food costs. We need to find a crop that will grow on marginal land not used for food and use that for fuel. We need to see that we are not sacrificing wooded acreage as we grow fuel. All of this has to balance out. We also need to make sure that the farmer of good food producing land does not suffer economically because he/she does not produce fuel over food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC