Reply #59: I'd like to think you know what I was referring to [View All]

[iverglas]

advocacy for policies designed to deny a basic civil liberty to others simply because you don't like it.

A vicious personal attack based on nothing but your own penchant for deceit and demagoguery.

Anyone who seeks to "deny a basic civil liberty" to anyone simply because s/he doesn't "like" it ... frankly, I don't know how to characterize such a person.

That would be because such a person would be kinda like a Sasquatch. I've never met one, so I can't really say what s/he/it would be like.

I'm pretty sure, at least in the case of the person who seeks to "deny a basic civil liberty" to anyone simply because s/he doesn't "like" it, that s/he would be both stupid and nasty.

And I have no doubt whatsoever that this was the one and only purpose of what you wrote: to portray me as stupid and nasty. Are you actually going to pretend it wasn't??


I do wish you people would at least sort yourselves out on one thing.

Is firearms possession, according to you, a human right? a civil right? a civil liberty?

Do you have a clue what any of those expressions mean?

I'm pretty sure not.



typo fixed