Reply #62: Why don't you go re-read [View All]

[Spoonman]

what I posted, before you resort to your standard personal attack methods.

My original post:

You might want to think about how to rephrase that opinion so that is doesn't come across as to insinuate the removal of rights from aging people that have NEVER been deemed "mentally ill".
The AARP might have a few words for the DNC if this was a DNC opinion. Thank heavens it's not.

You'll appear a hell of a lot more intellegent if you read the post before opening your spin flood gates!

"bitching furiously because we're criticizing the bigoted scumbag who used to serve as NRA president."

Try again, no where in my reply was I bitching.

Call him what you will, I could not care any fucking less, I am not, have not and never will be a member of the NRA!

If for one second you possessed any ability to interpret the English language without spinning it into an opportunity for personal attack, you would see the only thing I was commentting on was the potential implications of age and handicap discrimination!
Too bad your blind hatred led you off into a rant that clearly demonstrates your true nature.

"what the racists are SAYING"

I for one could care less what a buch of pin head fuck stains are spewing off at the mouth about.
You are the only person that seems to lend any relevance to them at all.
You are also the only person that seems to group anyone in opposition to your view as being synonymous with those groups.
To that I might add you express those accusations quite freely here in direct violation of DU rules!

I guess blanket accusations in appeal to emotion is all the zealots have left after EVERY argument they pose is dismantled with relative ease.