You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #87: I seeeeeem to think [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #85
87. I seeeeeem to think
Friend, I am not responsible for whatever perceptual or intellectual impairment anyone else may suffer from that interferes with his/her understanding of the things I write. It may seeeeeem to you that I am a pink koala bear, and there is nothing I can do about it ... although I might just question the honesty of anyone's claim that I seem to him/her like any such thing.

You seem to think that when a company manufactures a product that could be dangerously abused, that the company should be held liable.

You seem to think that by copying and pasting what someone wrote and then stating a conclusion that is entirely unsupported by the evidence you offered, you have accomplished something.

You then followed that up with your HUGE BOLD FONT political profile of Pete Coors, as though the fact that he's a Republican should clearly implicate him in wrongdoing.

You then follow that up with yet another claim unsupported by any evidence, as though two unsubstantiated allegations are better than one.

Then when I called you out on the faulty correlation, you and Benchley accused me of fronting for scumbag Republicans.

I didn't do anything when you "called me out on the faulty correlation", because you never did any such thing. You could no more call me out on a faulty correlation than I could praise your candour. You can't hit a baseball with a bat when the only baseball in the vicinity is the one someone says is there, that never was.

And here we go with the diversionary grooming -- a fresh allegation without evidence. I "accused <you> of fronting for scumbag Republicans"? Where might that have been?

But I'm glad that you can type dissertations on things that are neither pertinent or interesting.

Of course you are! What did you imagine anyone thought your aim was if not to present an endless series of stuff that is neither pertinent nor interesting and yet, at the same time, is offensive to anyone who cares about civility of discourse?? Mission accomplished, eh?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC