You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: cars and planes - some german aspects [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
medienanalyse Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. cars and planes - some german aspects
Edited on Sun Apr-04-04 04:53 AM by medienanalyse
I find your chitchat a valuable mind clearing. We germans are said to be very official and serious, but: My guess is that airtraffic means some more paperwork and bureaucracy than to run a car in Germany.
We have the following issues involved:
a) registration (ownership)
b) TÜV (technical surveillance) (streetworthyness)
c) taxes
d) insurance

All of them are interwoven. I.e. without paying your taxes you will get a lot of problems leading in the end to loosing the car. But if you go to the registration office and tell them that your car is an oldtimer: you will get a special tax. Or if you tell them that you did not get streetworthyness anymore, you will loose a button on the plates, but you can still obtain the physical car (you are the owner) and the plates - but never show up on a street with it, otherwise ...
it is in you interest to not pay any insurance and tax anymore in this case.

So to compare it with the four planes: if I were regulating the FAA procedures according to international law, tax law, airsafety law and insurance law: I would keep up the registration of the planes including (!!!!) my undisputable will to tax the planes to inspect them regularly and to know them to be insured - untill the owner comes and changes the registration. Oldtimers would loose airworthyness (remark in the computersystem and remark in your paperwork) and duty of insurance. The registration would not be wiped out but changed in the case of a passenger jet because of the sense of ACARS: to make sure that parts of the planes are branmarked wit their history.

The question remains: was the registration changed to another owner/oldtimer/destroyed ? No? So the companies still pay taxes, check the airworthyness and keep the planes insured untill now.

Tertium non datur. There is no alternative.

Dulce: to fix your case - have you with your incredible possibilities of research any idea where the United planes were insured and if they still pay the insurance? (because the airworthyness they might get in another country too -or not?) Is there a "last inspection -button somewhere at the FAA? Compared with other planes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC