Reply #7: Oh, I get it. [View All]

[Bolo Boffin]

You will, of course, explain how my arguments are spurious, because I'm not inclined to accept your simple assertion that they are.

For example, here's one of my arguments:

The tape says that there were just two small fires in WTC 7. I show the evidence that there were many, many, many more fires in WTC 7. Much of the first chapter of this tape bases its arguments on the idea of there being two small fires (just like WTC 7 had a great deal of its structure based on that unusual transfer beam that straddled the electrical substations under the building). So by showing that there were far more than two small fires, I undermine most of the entire first third of the tape.

Now please explain how disproving a major assumption of the video is spurious.