You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: I'm a LIBERAL. Please stifle your cries of surprise. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Pikku Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-04 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm a LIBERAL. Please stifle your cries of surprise.
The question is how to spread this message to people who voted repub without understanding what they were voting for. My experience has been that many people voted B* despite the fact that they agreed with next to none of his policies.

"Neoconservative" means nothing to the Bush voters I've seen. Some of them hear the "conservative" part without hearing the "neo" part. What big a deal can such a small word part mean? Neo = new and new is always better, right?

Lakoff, ho, folks. New + conservative = new, shiny money-saving, cautious (even reluctant) interventionist.

Were you to pair the term "neocon" wih the description given by the CSM (posted below), not one of them would make the link.

"-Want the US to be the world's unchallenged superpower
-Share unwavering support for Israel
-Support American unilateral action
-Support preemptive strikes to remove perceived threats to US security
-Promote the development of an American empire
-Equate American power with the potential for world peace
-Seek to democratize the Arab world
-Push regime change in states deemed threats to the US or its allies"

I'd have to argue that the people I know who voted Bush here were isolationists in the CSM model. So our job might be to point out the differences between the isolationist model people thought they were voting for, and the neocon model, which they did, in fact, vote for but I doubt that they support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC