You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #54: It is not compromise with the right that is needed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-29-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
54. It is not compromise with the right that is needed
You are correct, they do see compromise as weakness and have no interest in seeing any of our issues advanced.

The point of urging compromise is to adopt moderate positions.

All but the most radical among us can agree that a high abortion rate is not desirable, if for no other reason than that all abortion techniques put the mother's life and health at risk. Making abortions illegal simply does not solve the problem. Empowering women in ways that allow them to keep and care for their children is the right approach.

Seperation of church and state should not be compromised. However, in all honesty I am perfectly capable of ignoring a tacky rock with the 10 cammandments carved on it. They only try to put these things in our face to start an argument and gain publicity. "Them liberals are against the 10 commandments, next they will be banning Bibles!"

Post the 10 commandments everywhere and crime will not drop and people will still commit adultery. People ignore stop signs and traffic lights, why would this be any different? It is a stupid and meaningless effort on the part of the right wing done for no other purpose than to start a fight. Why take the bait?

On the environment, begin to understand that people need to live somewhere. Every development project is not a cardinal sin against the holies of holies. Yes, some projects are absurd and need to be opposed. But generally, when people meet the law, get out of the way. There are plenty of folks who don't meet the law, focus on them. If the laws are not restrictive enough, lobby for stronger laws, citizen initiatives are a good route.

Understand that we must live within our means even if your priorities must face budget cuts. If you do not like it, support candidates that will raise your taxes (as opposed to someone else's). It is all too convenient to believe that we can have everything we want by taxing someone else and it fails to show courage of your convictions






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC