You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: No, it doesn't only apply to rape cases. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, it doesn't only apply to rape cases.
Edited on Mon Mar-07-05 03:14 AM by BullGooseLoony
Let's say that the mother initially agreed to attach herself to her dying son, but then changed her mind and wanted to detach the tubes.

Are you saying that she can't change her mind? And, remember- we're dealing with her son, in this thought experiment, who she brought into this world.

The really funny thing about this response is that even if the woman PLANNED on getting pregnant, she STILL has the right to remove that fetus/baby from her body. It doesn't just cover accidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC