You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: Woops, I did have a math error there... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Woops, I did have a math error there...
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 01:51 PM by calipendence
Added in the four state totals twice by mistake. Doing it nationwide would help over the present system, but not by much. In case anyone is wondering about the state-by-state breakdowns that I figured them to be (in case someone wants to correct me on any of them), here they are:

Actual Electoral votes:
State (Actual Kerry-Bush) (Percentage Kerry-Bush) (difference) (best/worst difference)
-------------------------------------------------------------
* California (55-0) (29-25-1) (-25/-26) (-25/-26)
Florida (0-27) (13-14) (+13) (-12/-13)
* New York (31-0) (18-12-1) (-12/-13) (-24/-26)
Texas (0-34) (13-21) (+13) (-11/-13)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama (0-9) (3-6) (+3) (-8/-10)
Alaska (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (-7/-9)
Arizona (0-10) (4-6) (+4) (-3/-5)
Arkansas (0-6) (3-3) (+3) (0/-2)
Colorado (0-9) (4-5) (+4) (+4/+2)
Connecticut (7-0) (4-3) (-3) (+1/-1)
DC (3-0) (3-0) (0) (+1/-1)
Delaware (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (0/-2)
Georgia (0-15) (6-9) (+6) (+6/+4)
Hawaii (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (+4/+2)
Idaho (0-4) (1-3) (+1) (+5/+3)
Illinois (21-0) (12-9) (-9) (-4/-6)
Indiana (0-11) (4-7) (+4) (0/-2)
Iowa (0-7) (3-4) (+3) (+3/+1)
Kansas (0-6) (2-4) (+2) (+5/+3)
Kentucky (0-8) (3-5) (+3) (+8/+6)
Louisiana (0-9) (4-5) (+4) (+12/+10)
Maine (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (+10/+8)
Maryland (10-0) (6-4) (-4) (+6/+4)
* Massachusetts (12-0) (7-4-1) (-5/-6) (+1/-2)
Michigan (17-0) (9-8) (-8) (-7/-10)
Minnesota (10-0) (5-5) (-5) (-12/-15)
Mississippi (0-6) (2-4) (+2) (-10/-13)
Missouri (0-11) (6-5) (+5) (-5/-8)
Montana (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (-4/-7)
Nebraska (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (-2/-5)
Nevada (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (0/-3)
New Hampshire (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (-2/-5)
New Jersey (15-0) (8-7) (-7) (-9/-12)
New Mexico (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (-7/-10)
North Carolina (0-15) (7-8) (+7) (0/-3)
North Dakota (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+1/-2)
Ohio (0-20) (10-10) (+10) (+11/+8)
Oklahoma (0-7) (2-5) (+2) (+13/+10)
Oregon (7-0) (4-3) (-3) (+10/+7)
Pennsylvania (21-0) (11-10) (-10) (0/-3)
Rhode Island (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (-1/-4)
South Carolina (0-8) (3-5) (+3) (+2/-1)
South Dakota (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+3/0)
Tennessee (0-11) (5-6) (+5) (+8/+5)
Utah (0-5) (1-4) (+1) (+9/+6)
Vermont (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (+8/+5)
Virginia (0-13) (6-7) (+6) (+!4/+11)
Washington (11-0) (6-5) (-5) (+9/+6)
West Virginia (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (+11/+8)
Wisconsin (10-0) (5-5) (-5) (+6/+3)
Wyoming (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+7/+4)

* - a dangling electoral vote that percentages can't really decide without some other criteria.

So total, if percentage rule was counted everyplace, the revised numbers would be:

At best for Kerry (+7 votes):
Bush - 279 votes (51.85874%)
Kerry - 259 votes (48.14126%)

At worst for Kerry:
Bush - 282 votes (52.41636%)
Kerry - 256 votes (47.58364%)

These numbers are a lot closer to the real percentages of the vote, but still give Bush a percentage point advantage over a straight national vote. So yes, option 2 would be preferable to present status quo given last election's results. I'll try and look at the 2000 election when I get more time later to see if it would have been preferable then too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC