cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-16-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Woops, I did have a math error there... |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 01:51 PM by calipendence
Added in the four state totals twice by mistake. Doing it nationwide would help over the present system, but not by much. In case anyone is wondering about the state-by-state breakdowns that I figured them to be (in case someone wants to correct me on any of them), here they are:
Actual Electoral votes: State (Actual Kerry-Bush) (Percentage Kerry-Bush) (difference) (best/worst difference) ------------------------------------------------------------- * California (55-0) (29-25-1) (-25/-26) (-25/-26) Florida (0-27) (13-14) (+13) (-12/-13) * New York (31-0) (18-12-1) (-12/-13) (-24/-26) Texas (0-34) (13-21) (+13) (-11/-13) ------------------------------------------------------------- Alabama (0-9) (3-6) (+3) (-8/-10) Alaska (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (-7/-9) Arizona (0-10) (4-6) (+4) (-3/-5) Arkansas (0-6) (3-3) (+3) (0/-2) Colorado (0-9) (4-5) (+4) (+4/+2) Connecticut (7-0) (4-3) (-3) (+1/-1) DC (3-0) (3-0) (0) (+1/-1) Delaware (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (0/-2) Georgia (0-15) (6-9) (+6) (+6/+4) Hawaii (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (+4/+2) Idaho (0-4) (1-3) (+1) (+5/+3) Illinois (21-0) (12-9) (-9) (-4/-6) Indiana (0-11) (4-7) (+4) (0/-2) Iowa (0-7) (3-4) (+3) (+3/+1) Kansas (0-6) (2-4) (+2) (+5/+3) Kentucky (0-8) (3-5) (+3) (+8/+6) Louisiana (0-9) (4-5) (+4) (+12/+10) Maine (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (+10/+8) Maryland (10-0) (6-4) (-4) (+6/+4) * Massachusetts (12-0) (7-4-1) (-5/-6) (+1/-2) Michigan (17-0) (9-8) (-8) (-7/-10) Minnesota (10-0) (5-5) (-5) (-12/-15) Mississippi (0-6) (2-4) (+2) (-10/-13) Missouri (0-11) (6-5) (+5) (-5/-8) Montana (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (-4/-7) Nebraska (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (-2/-5) Nevada (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (0/-3) New Hampshire (4-0) (2-2) (-2) (-2/-5) New Jersey (15-0) (8-7) (-7) (-9/-12) New Mexico (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (-7/-10) North Carolina (0-15) (7-8) (+7) (0/-3) North Dakota (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+1/-2) Ohio (0-20) (10-10) (+10) (+11/+8) Oklahoma (0-7) (2-5) (+2) (+13/+10) Oregon (7-0) (4-3) (-3) (+10/+7) Pennsylvania (21-0) (11-10) (-10) (0/-3) Rhode Island (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (-1/-4) South Carolina (0-8) (3-5) (+3) (+2/-1) South Dakota (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+3/0) Tennessee (0-11) (5-6) (+5) (+8/+5) Utah (0-5) (1-4) (+1) (+9/+6) Vermont (3-0) (2-1) (-1) (+8/+5) Virginia (0-13) (6-7) (+6) (+!4/+11) Washington (11-0) (6-5) (-5) (+9/+6) West Virginia (0-5) (2-3) (+2) (+11/+8) Wisconsin (10-0) (5-5) (-5) (+6/+3) Wyoming (0-3) (1-2) (+1) (+7/+4)
* - a dangling electoral vote that percentages can't really decide without some other criteria.
So total, if percentage rule was counted everyplace, the revised numbers would be:
At best for Kerry (+7 votes): Bush - 279 votes (51.85874%) Kerry - 259 votes (48.14126%)
At worst for Kerry: Bush - 282 votes (52.41636%) Kerry - 256 votes (47.58364%)
These numbers are a lot closer to the real percentages of the vote, but still give Bush a percentage point advantage over a straight national vote. So yes, option 2 would be preferable to present status quo given last election's results. I'll try and look at the 2000 election when I get more time later to see if it would have been preferable then too.
|