You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: I'll Disagree, But Not Flame [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'll Disagree, But Not Flame
Terri is not considered brain dead because she needs a feeding tube, she is considered brain dead because various scans and tests have shown a lack of activity. Some people may require a feeding tube, or even assistance breathing, but if there is evidence of cerebral activity, that person is not considered brain dead. And many experts state that Terri is brain dead.

So, while I feel for you in your tough situation, Terri's case may be different than what is close to your life.

You are correct, Terri has no living will, and that is disturbing, to say the least. What is also disturbing is all the legal wrangling going on in this case. I think many Conservatives are using it as wedge issue.

I don't know these people, but I do know Terri's parents offered Michael a way to divorce her so he could move on with his life, but he refused. And yet, they are trying to paint him as a greedy monstor. If he were really a greedy monstor, and did not believe he was carrying out Terri's wishes, why wouldn't he just walk away (as they offered him the opportunity to do so)? On the other hand, he is living with and has children with another woman. He has, in a sense, moved on. To what extent does he still love and care about Terri?

As for her parents, I think they just can't let go. Maybe they see something because it is really there, and she is not brain dead. Maybe they just want to see something. In any case, they are being manipulated and exploited by the radical so called "Pro-Lifers"

And why would the courts determine she is brain dead and side with the husband? The Conservatives keep saying the courts are evil, I don't think that's fair. The courts are trying to look at this as objectively as possible. This is not to say that courts can't be wrong, but several courts in Florida have reviewed this case and determined that based on the laws on file, Terri Schaivo is brain dead and Michael Schiavo is her guardian.

Personally, I think they should pass laws that in the absence of written and properly witnessed instructions all measures must be taken. But I think that law should be effective going forward, not retro-active.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC