You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: How were the "offical" result collected and counted? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Griffy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. How were the "offical" result collected and counted?
Edited on Tue Apr-05-05 02:22 PM by Griffy
So.. you believe the numbers that diebold machine produce? because if you dont.. then I dont understand why you would trust the offical result! So after all that bush has done.. lies to war, propaganda, fake crisis and so on... you give him the benefit of the doubt.. shocking. Well there is proof of vote tampering and proof of voting machine rigging. The fact that you haven't seen this is sad.. Go read Conyers report on the election. Barabra Boxer found some proof of vote tampering.. and stood up in the senate to say so. Do you not see that fascist regime, do you not see the neocons running the government, do you not see the criminal activities of this administration? If you do see these things.. why in hell would you think that bush would play fair in the election... he didnt in '00 or '02.

So now I ask.. WHY do you default that offical results are right and assume the votes were counted correctly? Paperless electronic machine show a huge swing for bush, but I suppose thats not proof in your mind. You need to do some research on the election if you see no proof. I was at Dean fundraiser and he knows the election was stolen(bush's corperate friends do the vote counting as he said)! Its masses of people in denial that has puplic figures not saying this in public, the media is not reporting the truth or investigating anything in the public intrest.

Please have read the conyers report before replying.. get informed!

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/ohiostatusrept1505.pdf#search='conyers%20report%20on%20election'

at thats just the start...

As far as lied and got away with it, are you seriouos? We could start with the war in Iraq.. would it be extraordinary if he publicly said they had WMDs over and over.. then we get there, no WMDs, and now its liberating.. then democracy... lets see, we find PNAC documents and hear reports that the intel told them the info was really shakey.. at best. No way he coulda got away with that! As I said.. I would be suprised if he didnt cheat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC