You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: bullshit: "Would not use abortion litmus test for judicial nominees" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. bullshit: "Would not use abortion litmus test for judicial nominees"
let's not tap dance around what this means ...

litmus tests have gotten a bad rap ... what the statement in the base post really means is that this candidate, this "otherwise liberal pro-life Democratic 2008 candidate" could turn his back on the rights of women and potentially not stand up and vote against a judicial nominee who could tip the balance on the Supreme Court resulting in the overturning of Roe v. Wade ...

pro choice should absolutely be a litmus test ... what other rights are you willing to just toss aside ???? how about slavery? should that be a litmus test? or maybe women shouldn't have the right to vote ... maybe we could make that a litmus test you would agree with ...

but so many who answered the poll are just going to get sucked in by this bullshit "big tent" argument ... you're talking about endorsing a candidate who refuses to guarantee women their rights ... "well, if he's really liberal on other stuff i guess it's OK" ...

and one more thing to add a little reality to this ... much of this "abortion" business came up again not just based on Dean's unfortunate remarks but also because party leaders in Pennsylvania are trying to "annoint" Casey who is not just pro choice but also anti-abortion ... the BP did not acknowledge, though in all fairness Casey wasn't mentioned, that Casey's position is that he would support legislation that only allowed the "life of the mother" as a justification for an abortion ... this means, he would vote for legislation that did NOT include language about rape or incest ... got that ??? his position is barbaric ... Casey would support legislation that would force a woman to bear a child even if she had been raped ... that's the reality ...

so the poll question was based on the Democratic Party's sales pitch to get progressives to go along with a weakening of support for choice ... i am truly sorry that so many of you are willing to just throw away the freedoms that were fought for for so long by so many ... and all this just to "win" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC