You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #115: Banana Republic [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #108
115. Banana Republic
I've got to do a major computer upgrade (converting to a RAID array) so I may be gone for awhile but I'll quickly try to respond.

First of all I don't see a controversy. I don't know what something is worth to someone else and I can't know. I am not them. All I know is that I need 10 bananas a day to survive. If others want to enter into a mutually beneficial relationship, (I pick your bananas for you but you get some insects for me and we swap,) we would have to come to terms as to how many bananas are worth how many insects. That would constitute a "transaction."

In simplistic terms, all "transactional" goods and services are worth whatever the parties agree upon. Of course, this can be a highly complex decision as more and more parties become involved. That is why I tend to look unfavorably upon coercive systems where transactions are determined by cartels (OPEC for example). I tend to favor agreements freely entered into by all the parties involved because only they know what they want/need out of the transaction.

That being said, we are nowhere near our Bananaland example in so called "free-market" USA. There are many coercive elements that determine the parameters of the transaction, the Federal Reserve being the prime offender. You have rightly identified the favoring of certain types of capital and economic transactions in our current tax code and societal organization. We have certain cartels (energy, medical, financial, media to name a few) that operate with little effective oversight and skew the transactions in their favor.

As far as rewarding labor, especially for productivity, I am a firm believer in employee stock ownership and profit sharing. I even think it is worth codifying into social legal frameworks. This form of "labor banking" would not only blur the "perceived" line between labor and capital (one that I claim should not exist), but it would radically transform most corporations into more than simple economic units.

Got to go bang my head into my computer. Maybe a banana would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC