You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: This is why I don't want to get into it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. This is why I don't want to get into it.
Here's a clip of John and Nellie stating unequivocably where the shots came from. There was no doubt to them, despite your suggestion otherwise.
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/connally.rm

You're flat wrong on how many witnesses said a shot came from the Grassy Knoll. There are 121 witnesses whose testimony is recorded in the WC records. Of those, 17 said they had no idea, 35 said a shot came from the knoll, 56 said from the SBD, five said both. And that's interesting, because everyone admits that Kennedy was shot at least once in the back. For him to have been shot in the front, there would have been shots from at least two directions. Only five of the 121 witnesses said they heard shots from both directions.

The autopsy photos are all over the net. Do a Google. Here's Kennedy in the limo not long before the shots, with his typical slouch and lean. Look at his lower neck in relation to his shoulder blades, then visualize the shot on the beck. It is about three inches from his shoulders, just to the right of his spine. The front wound was just at the bottom of his tie's knot (which is where the bullet pierced his tie).


Your comments on Lattimer are interesting, since they could be applied the other way as well. He's smeared by conspiracy buffs who can't prove him wrong. And I gave you two sources, but you only chose the one you could smear the messenger on, rather than debunking either one with evidence.

Billy Lovelady was not the witness who saw the package in Oswald's car. He was the man outside the SBD who some thought was Oswald in a picture. Wes Frazier and Linnie Randle (brother and sister) saw the package. Randle saw it as Oswald carried it from the garage to the car. Frazier saw it in the car. Neither said they paid much attention to it. If Lovelady also said he saw Oswald carrying the bag, I'm not familiar with the story. You'll have to show me where someone found curtain rods in the SBD, since the police said otherwise. (Cap JW Fritz- 4H218 in the WC papers).


On Oswald's shooting skills: "During his military career Oswald scored as a "sharpshooter" in December 1956, on two occasions achieving 48 and 49 out of 50 during rapid fire at a 200 yard (183 m) distant target, but failed to attain a marksmanship badge."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC