You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: Saw this too late last night to respond. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. Saw this too late last night to respond.
And it's long, maybe we can take it in pieces.

First: Nice job. I appreciate the time and effort that went into it. I wish all posts on DU were this good and this specific. I wanted that out in front before we discuss the specifics. (Sometimes debates get heated on DU. In case this one does, I wanted it up front that I respect your views, respect your opinion and the thought that went into it.)

Second: It is long and I am at work. I am going to try and summarize what you are saying. I could get it wrong. Feel free to have at any suppositions I make and do corrections. I will do the same.

Okay, that said let's go. As I read this, one of the big problems you have with this is that there is no punch behind the threat. I read in your post that you think Kerry is making a 'threat' of sorts that if certain things aren't done in six months, then what happens.

The truth of that is that neither he nor the other Dems are in a position to do much of anything in Iraq. They can suggest, they can try and formulate a consistent view of Iraq that the Party can take into next year's mid-terms, but they can't do anything concrete unless they can peal some Repubs off in the House and Senate and convince them to come along. (Maybe this will happen, but I still doubt it. Beyond Chafee, Snowe and maybe Collins, which other Sens. might come over to the Dems side?)

I read the speech and my thoughts on it were that the 'what happens if six months go by and it's more of the same' as Kerry calling it a quagmire, and asking for withdrawal. I saw him asking for the 20,000 troops who will be there for the elections in Dec to come home after that election. Then he wants our troops to draw back and have Iraqi troops slowly take over the defense of their own country. I also heard another call for the US to firmly and unequivocally state that the US has no plans for premanent bases in Iraq. This seems to be a very firm position on Kerry's part and this is not the first time he has said this. (He said it, for example, in June on the Senate floor.)

Again, you raised a lot of points (and I'm at work) but it's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC