Reply #15: Its easy to be "big government" *and* "fiscally conservative" -- [View All]

[IdaBriggs]

For example, I have no problems with the government employing people to be: teachers, law enforcement, meat inspectors, court workers, etc. I *love* the idea of people who have the job of holding corporations accountable for COMMON SENSE worker protections like health and safety issues, and construction quality (like building inspectors who make sure houses have electrical service that is "up to code" -- yes, I know its inconvenient, but its a lot cheaper than dealing with burning buildings and dead people).

My take is that enforcing the consumer protection laws -- including, for example, the endangered species act -- is good for the country as a whole, and helps the economy. Fuel efficient cars help not just the environment, but employ researchers and suppliers.

In the social services department (which is where I become fiscally conservative), I want there to be an adequate number of social workers to staff a community and provide help to those who need it, BUT (and here is where I am an absolute CONSERVATIVE), I want programs to focus on "TEACHING PEOPLE TO FISH" as opposed to JUST FEEDING THEM. I get the importance of feeding the needy, but I want programs that aren't just "charity" because they remind the recipient that this is a TEMPORARY situation, and we're all going to get through this, and get them back on their feet.

I do NOT want multiple generations of families doing the "government handout" thing; I don't want to deprive those in emergency situations of help, but after a year or two of getting help, I believe HEALTHY ADULTS (please note the word HEALTHY) need to be giving back to the community in some fashion. Its a matter of pride for them, and a "don't take advantage" thing for me.

:)