You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't US parties have opposition 'leaders' [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Astrad Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:46 AM
Original message
Why don't US parties have opposition 'leaders'
Advertisements [?]
I'm not all that up on the american political system so excuse me for this question. But in parliamentry systems, opposition parties (parties out of power) have leaders who exercise tremendous control of policy and issue positions. It doesn't seem to do a lot of good for the Democratic party not to have a leader. It seems to emphasize the notion that there is a lack of cohesion in the party. Why not elect a leader now who will run for president in 2008 and who exercises some discipline over the party while in opposition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC