You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: why to close down all the sex shops of course [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-23-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
57. why to close down all the sex shops of course
(cross-posted in the other thread)

Most states have laws against "pandering obscenity", but getting a conviction is a hard and expensive process and the parameters are well spelled out.

In order to find a book, magazine or movie obscene, the prosecution must prove to a jury that:

-- the work appeals to a "purient" interest in sex
-- The work is utterly lacking in redeaming social, litterary, artistic, educational or scientific value.
-- The work is against "community values".

First of all, that means you have to show the jury the entire film. You have to bring in expert witness to testify that the work appeals to an unhealthy interest in sex.

The defense is going to challenge that notion, with expert witness of it's own. It may show similar movies that were found not to be "obscene" by another jury in the same state. (bring your popcorn).

The defense is going to challenge the idea of "community values", when you can pay-per-view a similar movie on a cable system given a franchise by local government, or when any citizen in the community can get on-line and see the same movie.

It's hard to find 12 people who will decide that a movie is sooo bad that no one has any right to see it.

Now sex toys -- all they have to prove is "is this device meant to stimulate sexual organs". Juries are instructed to follow the law, regardless of their conscience -- with threats of contempt of court if they do not comply. Much easier to get a conviction.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC